Pines v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 2017
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chatman v. State · Wade v. State · State v. Seeger · LaRose v. State · Wells v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[The Court]: Have any threats or promises been made to you in order to obtain this plea of guilty other than the plea bargain? [Movant]: No. [[Image here]] [The Court]: And has anyone told you to say anything but the truth during this proceeding? [Movant]: No, sir. 3 [[Image here]] [The Court]: What is the State’s recommendation in this matter? [Prosecutor]: Your honor, as to Count I ... our recommendation is that defendant be sentenced to twenty years in the Missouri Department of Corrections as an X felon ... in that he has pled guilty to or been found guilty of three or more felonies committed at different times,.... And the State would request the Court to make a finding finding the defendant to be an X felon. [[Image here]] [The Court]: All right, let the record reflect that the Court finds based upon the prior convictions and the serving of time that the defendant, Clinton Cooper, is an X offender. [The Court]: And is that the recommendation your attorney told you the State would make if you entered this plea of guilty? [Movant]: Yes, sir.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cooper v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.