Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 779 F.2d 1505 - Pennington v. Spears

Pennington v. Spears’s Empirical Analysis

779 F.2d 1505 · 1986

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
February 2022
most recently cited

7 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently February 2022

7 federal appellate ·

8019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Chemical Manufacturers Ass'n v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Thompson v. Wainwright · United States v. Colson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although it is not clear from the record whether [petitioner] has in fact exhausted state remedies, it is clear that the state does not assert a defense of lack of exhaustion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.