Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 779 F.2d 356 - United States v. Chu

United States v. Chu’s Empirical Analysis

779 F.2d 356 · 1985

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
February 2001
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently February 2001 · most notably Petzoldt v. Commissioner (1989), United States v. Stillwell (1990)

15 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

150198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 26 U.S.C. § 7201

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Berger v. United States · United States v. Young · Holland v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether, after reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “of the illegally unreported income represented by the calculated increase in net worth plus non-deductible expenditures in the year in question ... or all possible sources of non-taxable income must be negated.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'relevant leads furnished by the taxpayer--leads reasonably susceptible of being checked, which, if true, would establish the taxpayer's innocence.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.