Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 779 F.2d 8 - Hand v. Central Transport, Inc.

Hand v. Central Transport, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

779 F.2d 8 · 1985

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
July 2011
most recently cited

45 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently July 2011 · most notably Gutierrez v. Lynch (1987), Taft Broadcasting Company v. United States (1991)

45 federal appellate · 2 district ·

3401985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act)

Relies on Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. United States · Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. Hyde · Sawyer v. Louisiana · Bouldis v. U.S. Suzuki Motor Corp. · White & White, Inc. v. American Hospital Supply Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must be viewed in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]his court must apply the same test in reviewing the granting of a summary judgment motion that is utilized by the district court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.