Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 779 F.2d 820 - United States v. Stratton

United States v. Stratton’s Empirical Analysis

779 F.2d 820 · 1985

Citation profile

225
cited by 225 later decisions
10
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

158 federal appellate · 3 district · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 225 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably United States v. Maldonado-Rivera (1990), United States v. Concepcion (1992)

158 federal appellate · 3 district · 16 state decisions — followed in 10 states

111019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3771 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 843 (§ 403 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 848 (§ 408 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 952 · 21 U.S.C. § 963

Relies on California v. Green · Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Weaver v. Graham · Dutton v. Evans · Krulewitch v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 225 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if the court finds it necessary to excuse a juror for just cause after the jury has retired to consider its verdict, in the discretion of the court a valid verdict may be returned by the remaining 11 jurors.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “reasonable man in his position would not have made the statement unless he believed it to be true.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the record [did] not present even the slightest basis to believe that [the dismissed juror] was excused on a pretext to remove an obstacle to reaching a unanimous verdict”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.