Wingard v. McDonald’s Empirical Analysis
779 F.3d 1354 · 2015
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 38 U.S.C. § 1110 · 38 U.S.C. § 2302 · 38 U.S.C. § 2303 · 38 U.S.C. § 502 · 38 U.S.C. § 7252 · 38 U.S.C. § 7292
Relies on Henderson v. Shinseki · Henderson v. Shinseki · Henderson v. Shinseki · Smith v. Nicholson · Fugere v. Derwinski
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Court may not review the schedule of ratings for disabilities . . . or any action of the Secretary in adopting or revising that schedule.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“involve[s] 'an interpretation of language in the regulations' related to the [S]chedule,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.