Arias-Minaya v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
779 F.3d 49 · 2015
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229C (§ 240b of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Dada v. Mukasey · Sandstrom v. Chemlawn Corp. · Paredes-Urrestarazu v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Henry v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Jupiter v. Ashcroft
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]t is settled beyond hope of contradiction that . . . immigration courts may consider police reports even when they rest largely on hearsay.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]hose limits are generally satisfied as long as the trier first determines that the report is reliable and that its use would not be fundamentally unfair.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[s]imilarly, both the IJ and the BIA determined that use of the police report was not fundamentally unfair.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.