Poole v. Rourke’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 2011
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1090 · 10 U.S.C. § 1169 · 10 U.S.C. § 8811 · 21 U.S.C. § 812 (§ 202 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1491 · 28 U.S.C. § 1631
Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · United States v. Testan · McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. · Pierce v. Underwood · United States v. Sherwood
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'Department of Defense regulations control when they conflict with regulations promulgated by the Air Force.’ ” (quoting Poole v. Rourke, 779 F.Supp. 1546, 1565 (E.D.Cal.1991))); Casey v. United States, 8 Cl.Ct. 234, 239 (1985) (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) The seriousness of the circumstances forming the basis for initiation of separation proceedings, and the effect of the member’s continued retention on military discipline, good order, and morale. (2) The likelihood of continuation or recurrence of the circumstances forming the basis for initiation of separation proceedings. (3) The likelihood that the member will be a disruptive or undesirable influence in present or future duty assignments. (4) The ability of the member to perform duties effectively in the present and in the future, including potential for advancement or leadership. (5) The member’s rehabilitative potential. (6) The member’s entire military record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Williams v. Wynne“(а) It is the goal of the Department of Defense to be free of the effects of alcohol and drug abuse; of the possession of and trafficking in illicit drugs by military and civilian members of the Department of Defense; and of the possession, use, sale, or promotion of drug abuse paraphernalia. Alcohol and drug abuse is incompatible with the maintenance of high standards of performance, military discipline, and readiness. Therefore, it is the policy of the Department of Defense to: sf: :•{ sfc”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.