Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 779 NE2D 1158 - Walker v. State

Walker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2004
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Sandstrom v. Montana · Francis v. Franklin · Sanders v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a person who knowingly or intentionally aids, induces, or causes another person to commit an offense commits that offense, even if the other person 1) has not been prosecuted for the offense; 2) has not been convicted of the offense; or 3) has been acquitted of the offense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.