Aldridge v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2013
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Haycraft v. State · Newsome v. State · Harrington v. State · Burrell v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[elvery person is competent to be a witness except as otherwise provided in [the Indiana Evidence] rules, or by act of the Indiana General Assembly.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Richard v. State · Howard v. State“Court: [D]o you understand the difference between telling the truth and telling a lie? [L.B.]: Yes. Court: Okay. If I told you that I was sitting up here and this robe in [sic] color, would that be the truth or would it be a lie? [L.B.]: Lie. Court: Okay. And sometimes if you get caught telling a lie, what happens to you? [L.B.] I get in trouble and I have a time out.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“read in conjunction with the repeal of the subdivision regarding children in the witness competency statute, abandoned the previous arbitrary lines drawn regarding age, in favor of a rule which assumes competency until otherwise demonstrated by the opponent of the testimony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Richard v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.