Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 779 NW2D 562 - State v. Koppi

State v. Koppi’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2011
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Friedman v. Commissioner of Public Safety · State v. Juarez · State v. Carlson · State v. Sorenson · State v. Kuhnau

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t can be said beyond a reasonable doubt that the incorrect instruction had • no significant impact on the verdict because, despite the instruction, the jury was not left to rely on the officer’s subjective belief. Rather, in explaining the reason for his belief that Koppi was impaired, the officer testified to the objective facts that gave him cause to stop Koppi’s car.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.