State v. Cox’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
February 2022
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Crawford v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · Burks v. United States · Tibbs v. Florida
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) that the declarant-witness is unavailable; (2) that the defendant engaged in wrongful conduct; (3) that the wrongful conduct procured the unavailability of the witness; and (4) that the defendant intended to procure the unavailability of the witness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sh aka“[w]hile defendants have no duty to assist the State in proving their guilt, they do have the duty to refrain from acting in ways that destroy the integrity of the criminal-trial system.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sh aka“extinguishes confrontation claims on essentially equitable grounds.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sh aka
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.