State v. Webb’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently October 2020 · most notably State v. Menzies (1994), State v. Workman (1993)
3 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ohio v. Roberts · Burks v. United States · California v. Green · Barber v. Page · Mattox v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the interest of justice will best be served by admission of that [out-of-court] statement.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lamper · State v. Matsamas“admission of certain evidence could be justified under a hearsay exception, yet still violate the defendant’s constitutional right of confrontation.... The critical inquiry is whether the values embodied in the confrontation clause are impinged upon by the admission of the hearsay and, if so, whether there are adequate safeguards to protect those values.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Carter“Our reading of ... United States Supreme Court cases leads us to conclude that in order for a witness to be constitutionally unavailable, it must be practically impossible to produce the witness in court. It is not enough to show that the witness would be uncomfortable on the stand or that testifying would be stressful.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Bullock
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.