Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 779 P2D 1245 - Parker v. State

Parker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 2017

6 state decisions

401989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ohio v. Roberts · Kimmelman v. Morrison · United States v. Inadi · United States v. Nick · United States v. Dorian

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a three-phase process, the first phase involving the filing of the application and the assessment of its sufficiency to set out a prima facie case for relief, the second phase involving discovery and review for genuine issues of material fact, and the third involving the evidentiary hearing and formal resolution of disputed facts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In effect, Parker [takes] the position that, absent an affirmative explanation for his trial counsel's election to forego presenting character witnesses, his trial counsel's performance should be deemed incompetent. This position misallocates the applicable burden of proof and [it] has been squarely rejected.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “If the record ... is silent with regard to an issue and the witnesses are unable to remember, the state has not failed to substantiate its case; to the contrary, the prisoner has failed in his collateral attack on the judgment of conviction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.