State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 2007
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kelly v. Zamarello · Zeman v. Lufthansa German Airlines · Weil & Associates v. Urban Renewal Agency · Peterson v. Wirum · Chilli v. McKeesport School District
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) An aggrieved bidder may, within five days after award of a contract, appeal to the department for hearing. (b) A bidder requesting hearing shall (1) submit his appeal in writing within five days of the award; (2) explain in detail all of the reasons for the appeal; (3) send a copy of his appeal to all interested parties, including all other bidders. (c) The appeal for hearing will be reviewed by the commissioner and the aggrieved bidder will be advised within 15 days whether his appeal was accepted or rejected and, if rejected, the reasons for that action. (d) When appeal for hearing is accepted, it will (1) be scheduled as soon as practicable, but not later than 20 days after acceptance; (2) be held in the town where the sealed bid was publicly opened; (3) be made known to all interested parties at least five calendar days prior to the hour of hearing; (4) be recorded in its entirety. (e)All interested parties wishing to be heard at the hearing should submit a written brief of their statement to the hearing officer no later than 24 hours prior to hour of hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.