Aucoin v. Fell’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2010
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 640 So. 2d 237 - City of New Orleans v. Board of Com'rs · Mack v. Harris Chevrolet · Sanders v. Gore · 670 So. 2d 434 - Downs v. RTS Sec., Inc. · 722 So. 2d 1036 - Guidry v. Hedburg
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The exception of no cause of action tests the legal sufficiency of the petition by determining whether the law affords a remedy on the facts that are alleged in the petition. McDonald v. Zapata Protein (USA), Inc., 97-10 (La.App. 3 Cir. 4/30/97) ; 693 So.2d 296 . The mover has the burden of proof, the allegations in the petition are presumed to be true, and all reasonable inferences are made in favor of the non-moving party. City of New Orleans v. Bd. of Comm’rs of Orleans Levee Dist., 93-690 (La.7/15/94); 640 So.2d 237 , writ denied 96-2820 (La.1/6/97); 685 So.2d 116 . An appellate court reviews judgments granting an exception of no cause of action de novo, using the same standard as the trial court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.