779 So. 2d 1112 - McClain v. Pinecrest Development Center’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

14 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “no amount shall be included for any benefit or form of compensation which is not taxable to an employee for federal income tax purposes”

   4 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 788 So. 2d 720 - Gibson v. Lake Charles Ice Pirates · 830 So. 2d 572 - Burns v. St. Frances Cabrini Hosp.

2. “We recognize that the workers’ compensation judge made a finding that Pi-necrest’s failure to pay the invoices was “arbitrary and capricious” while the standard provided in La.R.S. 23:1201 is the reasonably controverted standard. However, considering that “[u]nreason-ably controverting a claim ... requires action of a less egregious nature than that required for arbitrary and capricious behavior,” Brown v. Texas-La Cartage, Inc., 98-1063, p. 8 (La.12/1/98), 721 So.2d 885, 890 , we find no error under the facts of this case.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 63 So. 3d 354 - Green v. NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO

3. “At the time of her injury, Pinecrest was making retirement and Medicare contributions on behalf of Ms. McClain. She claims these fringe benefits should have been included in the calculation of her AWW. Pinecrest argues that pursuant La.R.S. 23:1021(10)(f), fringe benefits are not included in the AWW calculation.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 923 So. 2d 843 - Bennett v. Rapides Parish School Bd.