779 So. 2d 331 - Seither v. Seither’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 491 So. 2d 265 - Diffenderfer v. Diffenderfer · 154 Cal. App. 3d 780 - In Re Marriage of Hug · 64 Md. App. 122 - Green v. Green · Murray v. Murray · 88 N.C. App. 297 - Hall v. Hall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Given Lasche's statements that he could not 'speak with specifics about where the losses come from' ..., the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to deduct investment losses of Lasche's online business venture.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Crater v. Oliver“option is given as compensation, it can be deferred compensation for past services, compensation for present services, or compensation for future services”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ruberg v. Ruberg“[I]t would be impossible to hold that the trial court erred in treating [the stock options] as income”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Crater v. Oliver
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.