Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 779 So. 2d 341 - Lee v. State

779 So. 2d 341 - Lee v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2005
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 761 So. 2d 1015 - Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.111(e) & 3.800

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If an appeal is pending, a defendant or the state may file in the trial court a motion to correct a sentencing error. The motion may be filed by appellate counsel and must be served before the party's first brief is served. A notice of pending motion to correct sentencing error shall be filed in the appellate court, which notice automatically shall extend the time for filing of the brief until 10 days after the clerk of circuit court transmits the supplemental record under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(f)(6).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “might be intended to allow for the cooperative filing of the motion and notice by trial counsel and appellate counsel, the supreme court never envisioned authorizing pro se filings in this instance when individuals are represented by counsel. Id. at 342, n. 2 . The trial court should have stricken the motion because Rodriguez enjoyed”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the advantages of appointed counsel on his appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.