Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 779 SO2D 528 - WW Contracting, Inc. v. Harrison

WW Contracting, Inc. v. Harrison’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 2014
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Seymore v. State · 376 So. 2d 884 - Hulley v. Cape Kennedy Leasing Corp. · Tausinger v. Woodlawn Park Associates · 571 So. 2d 538 - Jupiter Square SC Associates, Inc. v. Tomary, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A written contract may be modified by an oral agreement if the parties have accepted and acted upon the oral agreement in a manner that would work a fraud on either party to refuse to enforce it.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “clause that specifically applied to the closing date, we turn to the trial court's ruling that it was either modified or waived. Shriver argues that the Kowalczyks orally agreed to extend the closing date until August 30. A written contract may be modified by an oral agreement if the parties have accepted and acted upon the oral agreement in a manner that would”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the written contract contains a provision prohibiting its alteration except in writing,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.