Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

779 So. 2d 670

Azmoe v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-03-21

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 2003

1 state decisions

Relies on Clements v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-03-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We reverse the order denying defendant’s motion for post- conviction relief. *671Defendant’s motion raises issues concerning the enforcement of his plea agreement. However, there is no transcript of the plea colloquy; the court reporting firm is unable to locate the reporter’s notes, and she has not responded to attempts to contact her. Therefore, the terms of the plea agreement are not part of the record, and nothing before the trial court conclusively refutes defendant’s allegations. Accordingly, defendant is entitled to an evidentia-ry hearing. See Clements v. State, 346 So.2d 1233 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).

¶2Reversed and remanded for an eviden-tiary hearing.

/779/so2d/670 · .json · Public domain