Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 779 SO2D 763 - State v. Clem

State v. Clem’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2010
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on McDougall v. North Carolina · 709 So. 2d 672 - State v. Johnson · 354 So. 2d 1332 - State v. Schwartz · State v. Narcisse · 414 So. 2d 666 - State v. Wimberly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A mistrial may be ordered, and in a jury case the jury dismissed, when: .... (3) There is a legal defect in the proceedings which would make any judgment entered upon a verdict reversible as a matter of law; .... (5) It is physically impossible to proceed with the trial in conformity with law; .... Upon motion of a defendant, a mistrial shall be ordered, and in a jury case the jury dismissed, when prejudicial conduct in or outside the courtroom makes it impossible for the defendant to obtain a fair trial, or when authorized by Article 770 or 771. A mistrial shall be ordered, and in a jury case the jury dismissed, when the state and the defendant jointly move for a mistrial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.