Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 779 SO2D 927 - State v. Richard

State v. Richard’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 2009
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · North Carolina v. Pearce · North Carolina v. Alford · Williams v. People of State of New York · Wasman v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “According to this court in State v. Price, [ 461 So.2d 503 (La.App. 3 Cir.1984)] the State should have amended the bill of information to reflect the Defendant's plea to the nonresponsive offense, which the State did not do in the instant case. However, later, in State v. Rito, [ 96-1444 (La.App. 3 Cir. 10/8/97) , 700 So.2d 1169 ] this court stated that, neither a statute, nor the constitution required the prosecution to amend the bill of information before a defendant can plead guilty to a nonresponsive crime. The court stated: It is well settled that a defendant may plead guilty to a crime nonresponsive to the original indictment as long as the district attorney accepts it. La.Code Crim.P. art. 487(B) and State v. Price, 461 So.2d 503 (La.App. 3 Cir.1984). Further, the state is not constitutionally or statutorily required to amend the information before the defendant can plead to a nonresponsive offense. Price, 461 So.2d 503 (Knoll, J., dissenting). Nevertheless, the court went on to decide whether the state's failure to amend the bill of information was harmless or reversible error. The court found the first circuit's opinion in State v. Barclay, [ 591 So.2d 1178 (La.App. 1 Cir.1991), writ denied, 595 So.2d 653 (La.1992)] to be dispositive of the issue. Discussing Barclay , the court stated: In that case, the defendant was charged by grand jury indictment with aggravated rape but pled guilty to conspiracy to commit aggravated rape. The court espoused the following harmless”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “B. (1) After commencement of execution of sentence, in felony cases in which the defendant has been sentenced to imprisonment without hard labor and in misdemeanor cases, the sentencing judge may reduce the sentence or may amend the sentence to place the defendant on supervised probation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “If a motion is made or filed under Paragraph A of this Article, the trial court may resentence the defendant despite the pendency of an appeal or the commencement of execution of the sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.