Jordan & Sons v. Pickett’s Empirical Analysis
1884
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 60 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 63 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1993 · most notably Cartwright v. Braly (1928), Williams v. Bedenbaugh (1926)
1 federal appellate · 60 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Munroe v. Pritchett · Tesney v. State · Steele v. Kinkle · Hanson v. Edgerly · Dill v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is not indispensable that the misrepresentation or concealment shall be the sole inducement”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“the failure to disclose a material fact, which the vendor knows himself, which he has a right to presume the person with whom he is dealing is ignorant of, and of the existence of which the other can not, by ordinary diligence, become acquainted.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.