Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 78 Ariz. 8 - State v. Webb

State v. Webb’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

109
cited by 109 later decisions
27
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

109 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 109 later decisions — most recently December 2014 · most notably 53 Cal. 3d 753 - Mercer v. Department of Motor Vehicles (1991), 230 Pa. Super. 563 - Commonwealth v. Kloch (1974)

109 state decisions — followed in 27 states

4001954196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Harold · Gibbs v. State of Arizona · State of Arizona v. Ponce · De Hart v. Gray

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 109 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While at the precise moment defendant was apprehended he may have been exercising no conscious volition with regard to the vehicle, still there is a legitimate inference to be drawn that defendant had of his own choice placed himself behind the wheel thereof, and had either started the motor or permitted it to run. He therefore had the “actual physical control” of that vehicle, even though the manner in which such control was exercised resulted in the vehicle’s remaining motionless at the time of his apprehension.”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““It is unlawful and punishable as provided in § 28-692.01 for any person who is under the influence of intoxicating liquor to drive or be in actual physical control of any vehicle within this state.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “enable the drunken driver to be apprehended before he strikes.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.