Zalevsky v. Steele’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 2018
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 158
Relies on Universal Minerals, Inc. v. C. A. Hughes & Co. · In Re Philadelphia Athletic Club, Inc. · In re Stanley Engineering Corp. · Time Sales Finance Corporation Walsh 19239 Rosoff 19240 · Mrr Traders Inc v. Cave Atlantique Inc Mrr Traders Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it to be a matter of common sense that notice of a public auction sale be given to the proposed buyer”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.