In Re Durr’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2015
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1129 · 11 U.S.C. § 1206 · 11 U.S.C. § 1225 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 506
Relies on Simmons v. Savell · Brite v. Sun Country Development · In Re Janssen Charolais Ranch, Inc. · Matter of Doud · In Re Mikkelsen Farms, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(a) Except as provided in subsection (b), the Court shall confirm a plan if: (5) With respect to each allowed secured claim provided for by the Plan— (A) the holder of such claim has accepted the plan; (B) (i) the plan provides that the holder of such claim retain the lien securing such claim; and (ii) the value, as of the effective date of the plan, of property to be distributed by the trustee or the debtor under the plan on account of such claim is not less than the allowed amount of such claim; or (C) the debtor surrenders the property securing such claim to such holder.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“proposing a payment with tangible property”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.