In Re Planned Systems, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably In Re Elmira Litho, Inc. (1994), In Re Ashgrove Apartments of DeKalb County, Ltd. (1990)
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1112 · 11 U.S.C. § 361 · 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 506 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. Radford · Anschuetz & Co. v. Mississippi River Bridge Authority · Alonzo Bailey v. State of Alabama · Wright v. Union Central Life Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the party requesting such relief has the burden of proof on the issue of the debtor’s equity in property; and (2) the party opposing such relief has the burden of proof on all other issues.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) requiring the trustee to make a cash payment or periodic cash payments to such entity, to the extent that ... use ... under section 363 of this title ... results in a decrease in the value of such entity’s interest in such property; (2) providing to such entity an additional or replacement lien to the extent that such ... use ... results in a decrease in the value of such entity’s interest in such property; or (3) granting such other relief, other than entitling such entity to compensation allowable under section 503(b)(1) of this title as an administrative expense, as will result in the realization by such entity of the indubitable equivalent of such entity’s interest in such property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.