Hendricks v. People’s Empirical Analysis
1925
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 1978
2 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Davis v. People · May v. People · Daugherty v. People · Briola v. People · Griffin v. People
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The record does not disclose that any challenges whatever were made by the defendant to any of the jurors. Moreover, there is nothing in the record to show prejudice or bias on the part of the jury, or that it was not a fair and impartial one.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Reppin v. People“Every person charged with murder * * *, shall be furnished, previous to his arraignment, with a copy of the indictment [information], and a list of the jurors and witnesses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sukle v. People“was not served prior to the day of trial with a list of the jurors,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sukle v. People
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.