Enyart v. Orr’s Empirical Analysis
1925
Citation profile
2 district · 36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably Liber v. Flor (1966), 37 Colo. App. 541 - Weigel v. Hardesty (1976)
2 district · 36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Treadwell v. Nickel · People v. Hill · Butler v. Phillips · Jackson v. Burnham · Manders v. Craft
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Furthermore, a stricter rule applies against plaintiff here than in ordinary actions, namely, that in an action by attorneys upon a contract for payment for services entered into while the relation of attorney and client existed between the parties, in addition to proof of the contract and performance, the attorneys must prove facts to show that the contract was fair and reasonable under the circumstances, and that the services to be performed were reasonably worth the amount therein stated, and the amendment only amplified the original statement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rupp v. Cool
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.