Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 78 Conn. 622 - State v. Culhane

State v. Culhane’s Empirical Analysis

1906

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
March 2000
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently March 2000

18 state decisions

5019061910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mack's Appeal from Probate · Mallory v. Mallory Wheeler Co. · Bronson v. Thompson · Nichols v. McCarthy · Rowland v. Isaacs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]ny one acting in a fiduciary relation shall not be permitted to make use of that relation to benefit his own personal interest. This rule is strict in its requirements and in its operation. It extends to all transactions where the individual's personal interests may be brought into conflict with his acts in the fiduciary capacity . . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.