Beach v. Inman

Decided February 1, 1897.)

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1897-02-01

<p>Patents — Iwmn&bment—Paper-Box Machine.</p> <p>Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 1925

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Beach v. Inman

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1897-02-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Patents — Iwmn&bment—Paper-Box Machine.

¶2Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York.

¶3Edmund Wetmore, for appellants.

¶4John Dane, Jr., for appellee.

¶5Before WAUBACE, BAOOMBE, and SHIPMAN, Circuit Judges.

¶6PEE CURIAM.

¶7We agree with the judge who heard the motion in the circuit court that the grooved roller of defendant’s machine is substantially the upper clamping die of the patent, for the mechanical reasons set forth in the opinion below. That being so, defendant’s machine is an infringement, and the order of the circuit court (75 Fed. 840) is affirmed, with costs.