King v. McClintock

Decided February 2, 1897.)

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1897-02-02

<p>Injitiíotiox — DrssonuTioN.</p> <p>Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of West Virginia.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1899

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on King v. Buskirk

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Charles Henry Simonton · Decided 1897-02-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Injitiíotiox — DrssonuTioN.

¶2Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of West Virginia.

¶3Maynard F. Stiles, for appellant.

¶4½. T. Vinson, for appellees.

¶5Before SIMONTON, Circuit Judge, and MOIOUS and BBAWMJY, District Judges.

¶6SIMONTON, Circuit Judge.

¶7This case presents precisely the same facts and the same questions as that of King v. Buskirk (just decided) 78 Fed. 233. The appellant is the same person as the appellant in that case, and the appellees were defendants in the injunction suits as well as in 1he action at law. The verdict of the jury was in their favor, and their motion to dissolve the injunction was based on that verdict. The decree of the circuit court is affirmed.