Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 78 F.2d 144 - Thomas v. Slavens

Thomas v. Slavens’s Empirical Analysis

78 F.2d 144 · 1935

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 1969
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 1969

6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

501935194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Singer Manufacturing Co. v. Rahn · Ritchie v. Waller · Mandes v. Midgett · Silent Automatic Sales Corp. v. Stayton · Schrayer v. Bishop

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * [T]o relieve the master from liability of his servant's acts, on the ground that he has deviated from the scope of his employment, the deviation must be so substantial as to constitute an entire departure from such employment for purposes entirely personal to the servant; and, where the servant, notwithstanding the deviation, is still to some extent engaged in the master's business within the scope of his employment, it is immaterial that he may also have combined with this some private purposes of his own. 40”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.