Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 78 F.2d 208 - Speaks v. Hoage

Speaks v. Hoage’s Empirical Analysis

78 F.2d 208 · 1935

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
December 1987
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently December 1987

4 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

100193519401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Crowell v. Benson · Voehl v. Indemnity Ins Co of North America · Hoage v. Employers' Liability Assur. Corp. · Madore v. New Departure Manufacturing Co. · New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Hoage

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “■ “It is claimed by appellant that the physical effort made by Speaks in carrying the can of gasoline subjected his heart to a strain which was a contributing cause of his death; and that the injury was accidental and occurred in the course of and grew out of his employment and was compensable. “The deputy commissioner, however, found upon the evidence that Speaks was suffering from a long-standing disease of the heart; that his death was caused by this disease; and that the evidence failed to establish that he suffered sufficient strain while at work to bring about the acute condition of the heart which caused his death.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.