Culp v. Repper’s Empirical Analysis
78 F.2d 221 · 1935
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 1972
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brooke v. Croson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“. “Again it was a matter, for the determination of the defendant whether of not this testimony would be necessary to the proper defense of his case * * * In that event it was entirely within the option of the defendant whether or not he should incur the expense * * * of taking'the testimony of these witnesses.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“only in an extreme case where it becomes essential in meeting a decisive issue * * * [will] such testimony * * * be admitted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Parks v. Ratcliff
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.