Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 78 F.2d 244 - De Groot v. United States

De Groot v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

78 F.2d 244 · 1935

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
3
states following
August 1998
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently August 1998 · most notably United States v. Corrigan (1977), Connolly v. Commonwealth (1979)

15 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

601935194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. United States · Starr v. United States · Brown v. United States · Beard v. United States · Bird v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A specific instruction which is defective in respect to the burden of proof is not remedied by correct general statements of the law elsewhere given in the charge unless the general statement clearly indicates that its consideration must be imported into the defective instruction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.