Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 78 F.3d 1015 - Lovelace v. Software Spectrum Inc

Lovelace v. Software Spectrum Inc’s Empirical Analysis

78 F.3d 1015 · 1996

Citation profile

323
cited by 323 later decisions
April 2025
most recently cited

44 federal appellate · 16 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 323 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably In re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation (1997), Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School (1997)

44 federal appellate · 16 district ·

16001996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder · Washington Post Co. v. Rebozo · Kramer v. Time Warner Inc. · Tuchman v. DSC Communications Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 323 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “only for the purpose of determining what statements the documents contain, not to prove the truth of the documents' contents.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “are relevant not to prove the truth of their contents but only to determine what the documents stated”). In the instant case, the propriety of considering the SEC documents arose in a context in which the truth of the statements made in the documents would not be relevant; rather, the only relevance would be what statements the documents actually contain. Defendants' motion to dismiss attached the SEC documents in support of two defenses: the”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[I]n deciding a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, courts must limit their inquiry to the facts stated in the complaint and the documents either attached to or incorporated in the complaint.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.