Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 78 F.3d 110 - Judd v. Wolfe

Judd v. Wolfe’s Empirical Analysis

78 F.3d 110 · 1996

Citation profile

81
cited by 81 later decisions
4
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 3 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 81 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably Hayhoe v. Cole (In Re Cole) (1998), In Re Cruz (2000)

8 federal appellate · 3 district · 6 state decisions

430199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 350 · 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 11 U.S.C. § 727 · 28 U.S.C. § 158

Relies on Stark v. St. Mary's Hospital · Beezley v. California Land Title Co. · In Re Mendiola · Hughes Alonzo Robinson v. Tommy C. Mann, Trustee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... the fundamental right enjoyed in bankruptcy is the right to file a proof of claim because filing a claim is obviously necessary in order to participate in the distribution of the estate’s assets. Section 523(a)(3)(A) honors this right, by excepting from discharge debts owed to creditors who did not know about the case in time to file a claim.”) (citation and footnote omitted). 36 . § 523(a)(3)(A) (emphasis added). 37 . See, supra, n. 32. 38 . According to Rule 3002(c), a proof of claim is considered”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A] discharge under sub-section (a) of this section discharges the debtor from all debts that arose before the date of the order for relief under this chapter, ...”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A discharge under section 727 ... does not discharge an individual debtor from any debt- (3) neither listed nor scheduled under section 521(1) of this title, with the name, if known to the debtor, of the creditor to whom such debt is owed, in time to permit- (A) if such debt is not of a kind specified in paragraph (2), (4), or (6) of this subsection, timely filing of a proof of claim, unless such creditor had notice or actual knowledge of the case in time for such timely filing; or (B) if such debt is of a kind specified in paragraph (2), (4), or (6) of this subsection, timely filing of a proof of claim and 7 timely request for a determination of dischargeability of such debt under one of such paragraphs, unless such creditor had notice or actual knowledge of the case in time for such timely filing and request;”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.