Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 78 F.3d 262 - Evans v. United States Parole Commission

Evans v. United States Parole Commission’s Empirical Analysis

78 F.3d 262 · 1996

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
June 2016
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2016 · most notably Johnson v. United States (2000), Johnson v. United States (2000)

31 federal appellate · 5 district ·

370199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. United States · Granberry v. Greer · Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc. · Gozlon-Peretz v. United States · Garlotte v. Fordice

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[FJirst, special parole follows the term of imprisonment, while regular parole entails release before the end of the term; second, special parole was imposed, and its length selected, by the district judge rather than by the Parole Commission; third, if the conditions of special parole are violated, the parolee is returned to prison to serve the entire special parole term, and receives no credit for his time spent in non-custodial supervision, or “street time.””
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A special parole term ... may be revoked if its terms and conditions are violated. In such circumstances the original term of imprisonment shall be increased by the period of the special parole term and the resulting new term of imprisonment shall not be diminished by the time which was spent on special parole. A person whose special parole term has been revoked may be required to serve all or part of the remainder of the new term of imprisonment. A special parole term provided for in this section shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, any other parole provided for by law.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The Parole Commission cannot 'impose' a term of special parole any more than it can 'sentence' a defendant to prison.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.