Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

78 F.3d 588

Docket No. 95-2680.

Johnson v. Class

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: February 6, 1996. Filed: March 12, 1996.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-02-06

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United States v. Blum · Graham v. Harman Graham

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-02-06

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.

Before McMILLIAN, WOLLMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

South Dakota inmate Cecil Johnson, Jr., appeals from the final order entered in the district court1 dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition without prejudice. On appeal, Johnson, through counsel, argues the district court erred in determining that he was not denied effective assistance of counsel at a state court hearing revoking his probation. After carefully reviewing the record, we conclude that Johnson's section 2254 petition was properly dismissed.

¶2

We deny Johnson's pro se motion. See United States v. Blum, 65 F.3d 1436, 1443 n. 2 (8th Cir.1995) (general policy is to refuse pro se filings when party is represented by counsel), cert. denied, 1995 WL 761577 (U.S. Jan. 22, 1996) (No. 95-7152).

¶3

The judgment is affirmed.

1

The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota

/78/f3d/588 · .json · Public domain