Roe v. Healey’s Empirical Analysis
2023
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975) · 20 U.S.C. § 1415 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · City of Los Angeles v. Lyons · Fw/pbs Inc II v. City of Dallas Mjr Inc · School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of Education · Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“inquiry into standing must be based on the facts as they existed when the action was commenced.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]his standard is satisfied 'if the threatened injury is "certainly impending,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“confer standing to seek forward-looking declaratory or injunctive relief”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.