Quevedo v. Rumsfeld

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided October 22, 2003

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2003-10-22

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2004

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-10-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Maria Luisa Quevedo appeals the district court’s order granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment in this employment discrimination action. Quevedo alleged that the defendants discriminated against her by failing to promote her because of her race and national origin. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Quevedo v. Rumsfeld, No. CA-02-806FNS (D.Md. Feb. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2AFFIRMED.