Holmberg v. Toomer’s Empirical Analysis
1919
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently January 1959
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hunt v. City of Jacksonville · Basnet v. City of Jacksonville · Benton v. State · Harrison v. Frink · Ragland v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A petition for a writ of certiorari alleges in effect that in an action of assumpsit brought against the petitioners herein, the Civil Court of Record for Duval County rendered a judgment for the defendants and that on writ of error taken to the Circuit Court, the judgment was reversed and the cause remanded to the Civil Court of Record for further proceedings. A writ of certiorari is not a writ of right in all cases. See Harrison v. Frink, 75 Fla. 22 , 77 South. Rep. 663 ; Benton v. State, 74 Fla. 30 , 76 South. Rep. 314 ; Hunt v. City of Jacksonville, 34 Fla. 504 , 16 South. Rep. 398 ; Ragland v. State, 55 Fla. 157 , 46 South. Rep. 724 ; Edgerton v. Mayor Green Cove Springs, 18 Fla. 528 ; Dean v. Wilcoxson, 18 Fla. 531 ; Basnet v. City of Jacksonville, 18 Fla. 523 ; 6 Cyc. 748; 5 R. C. L. 254. “A judgment of the Circuit Court on writ of error reversing a judgment of a lower court and remanding the cause to the lower court for further proceedings, is not a final adjudication of the cause; and the Supreme Court will not issue a writ of certiorari to such a. judgment of the Circuit Court. See First National Bank v. Gibbs, decided at this term; 4 Standard Ency. Law & Pro. 892, 901. ; “Writ denied.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Perlman v. Ryden
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.