Saylor v. Bastedo’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 2014
2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 80A
Relies on City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell Corporation · Girsh v. Jepson · Saylor v. Lindsley · Saylor v. Lindsley · Winkelman v. General Motors Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“schedule a settlement hearing to consider the evidence that has been developed,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Saylor v. Bastedo“the self-acknowledged provocateur in this now twenty-year-old litigation”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Saylor v. Bastedo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.