Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 78 F. Supp. 2d 781 - Shaw v. DLJ PERSHING

78 F. Supp. 2d 781 - Shaw v. DLJ PERSHING’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
May 2019
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866)

Relies on Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp. · Seus v. John Nuveen & Co. · Koveleskie v. SBC Capital Markets, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Considering this interpretation of § 118 ... this court can find no reason that the Seventh Circuit's reasoning in Koveleskie [ v. SBC Capital Mkts., Inc. , 167 F.3d 361 (7th Cir. 1999) ] as to Title VII claims would not apply with equal force to claims brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981 , which is another Act amended by the 1991 [Act].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “As § 1981 claims are often brought in conjunction with Title VII claims, this result [ ] safeguards against multiple proceedings and possibly disparate outcomes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The text of [§ 118] 'evinces a clear Congressional intent to encourage arbitration of' federal discrimination claims, including those under § 1981.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.