78 F. Supp. 2d 944 - McDannel v. Apfel’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 406 (§ 206 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Alyeska Pipeline Service Company v. Wilderness Society · Pierce v. Underwood · Shalala v. Schaefer · Spencer v. National Labor Relations Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“does not permit the Court to determine a reasonable fee on the basis of the work performed,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“reduce the applicant's hours to reflect a percentage reduction”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.