Rogich v. Rogich’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
1 district · 22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently October 2022
1 district · 22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brashear v. Brashear · Roosma v. Moots · Leverich v. Leverich · Maudlin v. Maudlin · Hendricks v. Hendricks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A divorce decree granting custody of a minor child to one of the parties may not be modified unless there has been a material, permanent and substantial change in conditions and circumstances subsequent to entry of the original decree which would indicate to the court’s satisfaction that modification would be for the best interests of the child. (Citations.) The burden of showing such changed condition rests upon the party seeking the modification. (Citations.)””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““In cases of this kind, the welfare of the minor children is the sole matter with which the court is concerned and custody is of supreme importance regardless of the claims and personal desires of the parents.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.