Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 78 KAN 448 - Brady v. Fuller

Brady v. Fuller’s Empirical Analysis

1908

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
4
states following
November 1951
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently November 1951

18 state decisions

70190819101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Nolan v. Otney · Love v. Blauw · Durand v. Higgins · Reed v. Hazleton · Hazleton v. Reed

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If, after conveying the property, the grantor undertook to keep a string upon the land and retain the power to mortgage, control and convey it, we would, as was said in Durand v. Higgins, 67 Kan. 110 , 72 Pac. 567 , ‘be bound to disregard that clause and hold that it did not serve to defeat the conveyance of the fee.’ ” (p. 453.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.