Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 78 KAN 618 - State v. Pigg

State v. Pigg’s Empirical Analysis

1908

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
May 1927
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Intoxicating-Liquor Cases · State v. Blackman · State v. Nippert · State v. Schaeffer · State v. Shook

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If they found that the defendant was the proprietor of the place where intoxicating liquor was sold, and that such liquor was in his possession and control as proprietor and was sold with his knowledge and consent, he would be guilty of a sale, although he might not have performed the physical act of handing out the liquor to the customer himself.” (p. 620.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.